Quantifying wildlife responses to conservation fencing in East Africa

نویسندگان

چکیده

The fencing of protected areas is increasing worldwide. However, the implementation fences for conservation has outpaced scientific assessment their effectiveness, non-target impacts, and long-term costs. We assessed landscape predictors fence crossing sites employed camera traps over a one-year period to investigate wildlife responses around Lake Nakuru National Park, Kenya. Specifically, we measured impact on wild mammal movement, temporal impacts maintenance crossings behavior. Cameras captured more than 65,000 detections animals approaching fences, with 3626 observed 2818 trap nights at 19 sites. Using these data, developed guide classifying fence-specific behaviors. Thirty-eight species approached known weak points in fence, 27 were recorded fence. No single environmental variable predicted detection or all species, but seasonality, human activity, habitat visibility, proximity an adjacent area each correlated species-specific locations. Additionally, breaches repaired fence-crossing locations occurred within days maintenance. conclude that popular, ‘one-size-fits-all’, designs may be ineffective costly restraining movement many species. recommend those deploying start clearly articulated management goals, informed by taxa-specific tendencies breach managers consider strategic creation corridors, overpasses, ungulate-proof link fenced surrounding habitat.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Context-dependent conservation responses to emerging wildlife diseases

© The Ecological Society of America www.frontiersinecology.org E infectious diseases can threaten wildlife populations already imperiled by other risks, drive abundant species to rarity or extinction, and alter the structure of entire communities (Van Riper et al. 1986; Skerratt et al. 2007; Langwig et al. 2012). Several potential disease management strategies have been proposed (Wobeser 2002; ...

متن کامل

Categorizing wildlife responses to urbanization and conservation implications of terminology.

The study of urban ecology has emerged as a key element of conservation research (Miller & Hobbs 2002). Urbanization is a primary driver of habitat loss and fragmentation but also provides an opportunity to design and manage cities to retain biodiversity and facilitate interactions between people and the natural world (Miller 2005). As the field has developed, Blair’s (1996) avoider, adapter, e...

متن کامل

Conservation value of multiple-use areas in East Africa.

Despite wide agreement that strictly protected areas (World Conservation Union categories I-III) are the best strategy for conserving biodiversity, they are limited in extent and exclude many species of key conservation importance. In contrast, multiple-use management areas (categories IV-VI), comprising >60% of the world's protected-area network, are often considered of little value to biodive...

متن کامل

Coffee Markets in East Africa: Local Responses to Global Challenges or Global Responses to Local Challenges?*

..................................................................................................................................... 1

متن کامل

Estimating Conservation Value of “Dashtenaze Sari” Wildlife Refuge, and Factors Affecting the Willingness to Pay for Site Conservation

Forests and rangelands are the most important natural ecosystems which provide many economic benefits to the society due to their biodiversity and ecological functionalities. Dashtenaz wildlife refuge, Sari, is a sylvan region, covering 55 ha of rangeland with abundant diversity, is refuge of an endangered species of deer called Dama mesopotamica. In this study, Contingent Valuation Method (CVM...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Biological Conservation

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0006-3207', '1873-2917']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109071